This month, Standard Lithium (TSX-V: SLL) / (OTCQX: STLHF) is targeted to switch on a relatively large-scale, proof-of-concept lithium extraction Demonstration Plant in southern Arkansas. If all goes reasonably as planned, it should take just a few months to prove the company’s proposed operational flow sheet. Then, management believes a final JV agreement with Lanxess Corp. will be signed.
CEO Robert Mintak commented,
“We’re making chemical products, not merely extracting a raw commodity. We’re doing sophisticated chemistry to produce a chemical that goes into batteries. It’s a high-end product.” GM [recently] announced they were going to build a $2.3 billion factory in Ohio to make lithium batteries. The industry is only going in one direction. We’re at the point where we’re going to be the U.S. hub for it. It’s the next energy revolution and El Dorado [Arkansas] will play a part in it....
….The key element is our growing partnership with German specialty chemicals giant Lanxess, a company with 73 chemical plants around the world employing tens of thousands. They have extensive and sophisticated sales networks to sell specialty chemical products. That’s a critical part of the whole story.”
Significant vote of confidence in Standard Lithium’s JV project
On October 30th, Standard Lithium Ltd. (TSXV: SLL) (OTCQX: STLHF) obtained a C$ 5M five-yr. loan, at just 3% interest from strategic partner Lanxess. The loan is convertible into 6,251,250 common shares, with 3,125,625 three-yr. warrants attached. The warrant strike price is $1.20 (shares were at $0.68 at the time of announcement). Please see the press release for further details.
These are very favorable terms, Standard effectively raised capital at a premium to market at a time when most lithium juniors can’t raise capital at all. The warrants were struck at a 76.5% premium to the October 30th share price. In the end, Lanxess will potentially own (6,251,250 + 3,125,625 = 9,376,875) shares in Standard Lithium, paying an average price of ~$0.93.
Assuming the new warrants get exercised, the company would have roughly 97.5 million shares outstanding and would have raised a total of $8.75M. Therefore, the pro forma Enterprise Value (“EV“) [market cap + debt – cash] with shares currently at $0.91 is about $82M.
Compare that figure to Standard Lithium’s interest in the after-tax NPV of (30% x C$1.336 billion = C$400 million). Standard is trading at 20% of its [30% share of the after-tax NPV]. Under certain circumstances, Standard’s interest in the project and its economics can be increased from 30% to up to 40%.
The loan represents another important milestone and clear vote of confidence in Standard Lithium, the JV project in southern Arkansas, and a very impressive management & technical teams led by Robert Mintak & Dr. Andy Robinson. For the past year, I’ve been saying that the company should be able to reach commercial production with fairly minimal equity dilution. This news is a meaningful step in the right direction.
If Lanxess is willing to invest today, at PEA-stage, with dismal lithium market sentiment, I imagine they might be willing to invest again in 2020 or 2021. That, or be a cornerstone order in future capital raises. This is on top of Lanxess’ expected commitment to line up 100% of project financing. Commercial production is expected to commence in 2022 with full Phase 1 production of 9,700 tonnes LCE/yr. (2,910 tonnes net to Standard) reached in 2023.
Use of proceeds will further advance the company’s Demonstration Plant (“DP“). When fully commissioned, the DP will continuously process an input “tail-brine” flow of ~50 gallons per minute. That’s an annualized production rate of 100-150 tonnes of Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (“LCE”). The DP is assembled on-site, commissioning started in December.
Above is a recent picture of the DP. As can be seen, it’s a fairly significant structure. Notice the pick-up trucks on the left and the UFO in the upper left corner! The facility is purpose-built to be scaled-up to commercial design capacity of 9,700 tonnes LCE/yr. in Phase 1 production, targeted to start in 2022, and be fully ramped up in 2023.
The DP showcases Standard’s proprietary LiSTR technology that uses a solid sorbent material to selectively extract lithium. The environmentally friendly process eliminates the need for evaporation ponds and reduces processing time from 12-18 months to a matter of hours, while, at the same time, greatly increasing lithium recovery rates.
Although a run-rate of 100-150 tonnes LCE/yr. is not much by commercial standards, it’s impressive as far as pilot plants go. Finished lithium products will be used internally for testing, and more importantly, will provide Lanxess proof of concept for its final investment decision.
Two years and C$ 20 million…
Standard could now be just two years from initial production of lithium products. In addition, the amount of additional equity capital required to reach that critical point could be only C$ 20 million.
If true, the company is pretty far along in having meaningfully de-risked the project. Remember, funding is the #1 challenge these days facing battery metals juniors. Standard Lithium appears to have the funding piece of the puzzle largely in place.
As readers of my articles & interviews know, there are a number of lithium brine projects in Argentina & Chile. Several in Argentina were expected to reach first production in 2021 or 2022. On average, I estimate those projects have been pushed back 18-24 months due to a lack of funding, and more recently, uncertainty around a critical Presidential election (the less mining-friendly candidate won) and social unrest / protests in Chile.
Even more recently, a mid-December ruling by a Chilean environmental court upholding claims of excessive water use by SQM seriously threatens its expansion plans in 2020 and beyond.
Perhaps half of the projects on the drawing board, (PEA-stage or further advanced), 2-4 years ago are no longer serious contenders. By NOT falling behind, Standard has caught up to Lithium Triangle projects, and could be in production ahead of the pack. This is very important. The early-to-mid 2020s will be a very good time to be in production, a time when global demand for lithium could finally take off.
Lithium producers trading on average at 7.5x Revenue
In the chart below, one can see that a representative sample of lithium producers is trading at an average EV to trailing 12-month revenue multiple of 7.5x. Eighteen months ago it was closer to 10x. Although Standard Lithium is not yet in production and will never be a giant like SQM or Albemarle, one can imagine what an indicative valuation might look like once the company reaches production.
Readers should take note of EBITDA margins among producers, averaging 29%. Haircutting the assumed margin in Standard’s PEA by one-third to be conservative still results in a healthy 45% operating EBITDA margin.
How much revenue (net to Standard Lithium) might be possible upon achievement of Phases 1 & 2? The chart below shows revenue scenarios for 2024 (after Phases 1 & 2 are fully online). According to its Spring 2019 prospectus filing, Standard will own at least 30% of project economics and perhaps up to 40%, depending on various factors that have not been made public.
In working on a broad, indicative valuation range, I assume 20 million shares get issued between now and yearend for a pro forma total of ~117,500,000. And, I discount indicative per-share valuations back 4 years at a 10%/yr. discount factor.
As can be seen, the range of per-share values is wide; from $1.30 to $5.14. I, of course, don’t know where the share price is headed, but using this chart for illustrative purposes makes me feel pretty good about the possibilities. Note, the current share price is $0.91.
At a 5x EV/2024 revenue multiple — on revenue from selling lithium @ US$12,000 / tonne — the indicative per-share value discounted back four years is $2.45.
Given that Standard Lithium’s (TSX-V: SLL) / (OTCQX: STLHF) JV project is well on its way to being fully funded with the technical & financial support of giant specialty chemicals conglomerate Lanxess, and given that a third-party PEA has demonstrated robust project economics, Standard Lithium is arguably more de-risked than the market is giving it credit for. Near-term catalysts, most notably the operation of the DP, will provide ongoing news flow.
In 2020-21 management will be tweaking the DP, sending out lithium product samples and working on a Pre-Feasibility Study. Market sentiment for lithium is at multi-year lows. Now might be a great time to be looking at lithium juniors, some of which could see a considerable bounce back in their share price along with lithium prices.
Disclosures: The content of this article is for information only. Readers fully understand and agree that nothing contained herein, written by Peter Epstein of Epstein Research [ER], (together, [ER]) about Standard Lithium, including but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts, calculations, etc. is not to be considered implicit or explicit investment advice. Nothing contained herein is a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security. [ER] is not responsible under any circumstances for investment actions taken by the reader. [ER] has never been, and is not currently, a registered or licensed financial advisor or broker/dealer, investment advisor, stockbroker, trader, money manager, compliance or legal officer, and does not perform market making activities. [ER] is not directly employed by any company, group, organization, party or person. The shares of Standard Lithium are highly speculative, not suitable for all investors. Readers understand and agree that investments in small cap stocks can result in a 100% loss of invested funds. It is assumed and agreed upon by readers that they will consult with their own licensed or registered financial advisors before making any investment decisions.
At the time this interview was posted, Peter Epstein owned shares of Standard Lithium, and the Company was an advertiser on [ER].
Readers understand and agree that they must conduct their own due diligence above and beyond reading this article. While the author believes he’s diligent in screening out companies that, for any reasons whatsoever, are unattractive investment opportunities, he cannot guarantee that his efforts will (or have been) successful. [ER] is not responsible for any perceived, or actual, errors including, but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts & financial calculations, or for the completeness of this article or future content. [ER] is not expected or required to subsequently follow or cover events & news, or write about any particular company or topic. [ER] is not an expert in any company, industry sector or investment topic.