![Epstein Research [ER]](http://EpsteinResearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/logo-ER.jpg){kind=logo}
There’s been a tremendous amount of attention on gold juniors over the past year, and rightfully so. Gold at $1,846/oz. is up +27% from 2020’s March low (down from an all-time high of $2,070/oz. last Summer).
Silver is up even more. However, I bet few readers know that copper (“Cu“) at $3.72/lb. (near an 8-yr. nominal price high) has soared +87% from its 52-week low. In the midst of a global pandemic, Cu has been one of the best performing commodities.
Copper fundamentals are strong, not just for this year and next, but for a long time to come. Goldman Sachs believes the world is entering a multi-yr. commodities super-cycle.
A renewed push for global decarbonization (with the U.S. back in the game & climate change increasingly undeniable) is one of several key factors pointing towards a new super-cycle thesis.
Copper fundamentals are strong for decades to come….
The 2020s will be remembered for massive deficit spending / debt issuance, which is bullish for precious metals — but also for base metals. Tens of trillions of dollars will be spent on giant Cu-intensive infrastructure & green energy projects. Renewable energy projects require 5x the Cu of fossil fuel plants.
The paradigm shift to vehicle electrification will boost Cu demand as well. EVs require 4x the Cu of internal combustion engine cars. Not to mention the Cu soon to be needed for 18-wheelers, delivery vans, construction, mining, military vehicles & equipment, ocean-crossing container ships, etc. Prodigious quantities of Cu will be required to build a vast battery charging infrastructure to make it all work.
Strong Cu demand is all but assured, but global supply is increasingly precarious. Many of the largest Cu mines are also the oldest & deepest — some date back to the 1800’s.
Mined Cu grades have been in decline for decades, as has the number of new, blockbuster Cu discoveries. Several well-known open-pit mines are now operating at grades at or below 0.25% Cu. That’s US$19/tonne rock.
….but copper supply is increasingly uncertain
Everything I’ve written points to one critical takeaway. Higher Cu prices are necessary to incentivize mining companies to invest billions of dollars, over 10-20 year periods, to develop reserves — and then plan, permit, fund & build mines, processing plants & tailings facilities.
Adjusted for inflation, the all-time high Cu price breached $6/lb. in the mid 1970’s. In 2011 it was > $5/lb. The 2020s will likely see a new record high price. That’s great news for up-and-coming Cu juniors with (prospective) mines opening this decade — not so good for old, high-cost, low-grade mines nearing end of life.
Chile is by far the leader in Cu production, accounting for 28% of the world’s mined copper in 2020. But, cost inflation & lower grades are taking a toll. Obtaining water to operate the mines, many of which are at elevations above 3,500 m, is tremendously challenging, costly & time consuming.
Peru is the second largest Cu producing country, it delivered 12% of last year’s mined copper. It too has mines at high and very high! elevations ( > 4,000 m). Northern Peru is widely considered to be more difficult for companies to do business in due to opposition to mining in some areas.
However, in the central & southern parts of the country, which in many cases have less population density, mine operations are better tolerated and permitting is easier to achieve.
In the most recent Fraser Institute Mining Survey, Peru ranked higher than 7 of 12 Canadian provinces and (also) 7 of 12 U.S. States. Overall it ranked near the top of the 2nd quartile.
Chile + Peru (a combined 40% of 2020 mined Cu) have been great jurisdictions to work in. Looking forward, both countries will likely remain Cu powerhouses, but fresh new mines will lead the way as aging, depleted mines shut down.
A newly-listed company that’s well positioned with two 100% owned, potentially world-class copper porphyry projects in Peru is Element 29 Resources (TSX-V: ECU). Both projects are at < 2,500 m elevation, a level that does not require specialized equipment as is often the case for mines at elevations > 4,000 m.
Element 29 Resources; advancing two promising Cu projects in Peru
Unlike for a growing number of properties in Chile, water is not expected to be an issue for Element 29. In fact, one of the two projects is close to a river. Both are outside of northern Peru, in the more mining friendly southern & central parts of the country. And, both are < 100 km from the coast.
The Elida property hosts a recently discovered (2013), untested copper-moly (Cu-Mo) porphyry cluster located ~170 km northwest of Lima, and ~85 km from the coast. Elida sits in a highly prospective porphyry belt in central Peru.
The Property consists of 28 mining concessions totaling 19,210 ha. It’s a cluster of at least four porphyry centers, with only the central target drilled.
The initial focus at Elida is on a sizable 750 m by 600 m central porphyry target. Management is pursuing a conceptual exploration target of 200 to 500M tonnes, grading between 0.35% to 0.45% Cu + 0.03% to 0.05% Mo + 3.5 to 4.5 g/t Ag.
This is no pie-in-the-sky 3-yr. goal. Element 29 is funded to deliver a NI 43-101 resource that could be > 200M tonnes by Q1 2022. Management already has 18 holes, nearly 10,000 m of historical drilling. The team needs to tighten up the spacing. A 3,600 m infill drill program is expected to start in April.
In 2014-15, Lundin Mining completed a modern 18-hole / 9,880 m drill program that intersected a robust porphyry system. All holes hit Cu-Mo-Ag mineralization. Most holes ended in mineralization, (some holes in moderately high-grade mineralization) meaning that the system remains open at depth.
Note: Drilling & sampling was carried out by Lundin Mining Peru SAC (2014-2015). ALS-Global Laboratories in Lima, Peru, analysed the half-core by ME-ICP41, which includes 35 elements using an Aqua Regia digestion ICP-AES analysis and gold fire assay with an AA finish (Au-AA23). The over limits underwent ME-OG46 for ore grade elements using an Aqua Regia digestion. Reported widths are drill core lengths; true widths are unknown at this time. Assay values are uncut. The calculated Copper Equivalent (CuEq. (%)) grade was used to determine the significant intervals (>0.20% CuEq. and >30 m core length, with higher grade intervals using a >0.40% CuEq. and >15m core length). *CuEq. = Cu(%) + Mo(%) x 2.667 +Au (ppm) x 0.6320 +Ag (ppm) x 0.0097 (no metallurgy has been completed at Elida, therefore no metallurgical recovery was applied in the copper equivalent formula). Cu Price= $3.00 USD/lb, Mo Price = $8.00 USD/lb, Au Price=$1,300.00 USD/oz, Ag Price=$20.00 USD/oz. The numbers correspond to Table 4 in the Elida Technical Report (refer to www.sedar.com for the full report).
The best assay at Elida was from hole DDH-15ELID012, which hit a wide intercept of 503 m of 0.42% Cu + 0.046% Mo + 3.2 g/t Ag = 0.58% Cu Eq., including 393 m of 0.455% Cu + 0.048% Mo + 3.6 g/t Ag = 0.62% Cu Eq.
Drilling confirmed very significant areas of potential mineralization. Management believes there is excellent exploration upside. And, preliminary metallurgical studies are planned with existing core taken from prior drilling done by Lundin. In my view, this is a top-quartile global Cu exploration project.
From Element 29’s NI 43-101 technical report on Elida,
“Elida is a Cu-Mo-Ag mineralized porphyry complex that is part of a cluster of porphyry centres exposed over ~2.0 by 2.5 km. Elida is the first Eocene-aged porphyry system identified in Peru. This suggests a re-appearance of the Eocene magmatic arc present much further south in northern Chile. The world-renowned Chuquicamata & Escondida porphyry copper deposits reside in the Eocene belt of northern Chile”
The Property and surrounding areas are mostly uninhabited. Land in the immediate region is not being used. Engagement with locals has been ongoing for years. A community agreement that was set to expire in 2020 was successfully renewed until 2025. Management anticipates few, if any, difficulties in obtaining surface & water rights.
I’m placing a great deal of faith in this leadership team. Their Chairman, Richard Osmond, CEO, Brian Booth and VP of Exploration, Paul Johnston have worked extensively in Peru and have considerable large & small mining company experience. The team includes notable experts in copper as well, like Director Peter Espig.
President & CEO Brian Booth (P.Geo) is very impressive; he has over 20 years with mining giant INCO and has held CEO & Director positions at other junior miners and is currently a Director at SSR Mining & GFG Resources.
Flor de Cobre, a 2nd potential company-making asset
Second, but not last, Flor de Cobre (“Flor“) is an 1,800 hectare property (+127 ha under option) in the Southern Peru Copper Belt. It hosts an under-explored, higher-grade, small past-producing copper mine in southwestern Peru.
The project sits 45 km southeast of the country’s 2nd largest city (Arequipa). It’s 30 km southeast of the fifth largest copper mine in the world Freeport’s (Cerro Verde), and just 7 km northwest of the Nexa Resources’ Chapi mine. Flor is wide open at depth and along strike to the northeast.
In addition to Cerro Verde & Chapi, multiple operating mines & deposits of > 10 Mt of contained Cu are in the Belt, including Cuajone & Toquepala (Southern Copper) and Quellaveco (Anglo/Mitsubishi).
The Flor area hosts a porphyry copper-molybdenum (Cu-Mo) system called the “Candelaria Porphyry”, with characteristics similar to other porphyry deposits in the Belt.
One or more Cu enrichment zones support high-grade potential
The Candelaria zone was outlined by two drill campaigns in the 1990’s and includes an enriched Cu zone with pockets of > 1% Cu. The dimensions are 850 m x 1,000 m. Rio Amarillo later produced an initial resource estimate based on drilling that covered ~488 ha, and was based on 40 diamond drill holes. {See page 10 of Corporate Presentation}.
In another area, there’s evidence to suggest that the Atravezado target could be a second Cu-Mo porphyry system, bigger than Candelaria at roughly 1.2 x 1.0 km. A geophysical resistivity signature at 400 m depth is similar to other porphyries in the Belt, making it a compelling target for testing.
In 1994, there were 60 drill holes completed at Flor, totaling 5,960 m. The best hole, K-008, returned 124 m at 1.37% Cu (from an enriched Cu zone). Preliminary metallurgical test work was completed to investigate recovery by leaching & flotation. The reported Cu recovery was 89.5%.
Phelps Dodge followed that year’s program with 36 holes totaling 5,882 m. Drill hole CD-128 returned the best intercept, with 40 m at 1.0% Cu.
Well funded to advance two top-quartile Cu exploration projects
Flor has higher-grade potential, but if Elida demonstrates 200M+ tonnes at a Cu Eq. grade of 0.40%-0.45%, then Element 29 Resources (TSX-V: ECU) could be sitting on two 100%-owned, top-quartile, (global) Cu exploration projects.
Both projects are funded through most of the year. New resource estimates, then 3rd-party Preliminary Economic Assessments (“PEA“) in 2022 could re-rate this exciting new story, especially if the Cu price moves north of $4/lb. Readers take note, the current price of $3.72/lb. is just 7% away from that important $4/lb. threshold.
Disclosures / Disclaimers: The content of this article is for information only. Readers fully understand and agree that nothing contained herein, written by Peter Epstein of Epstein Research [ER], (together, [ER]) about Element 29 Resources., including but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts, calculations, etc. is not to be considered implicit or explicit investment advice. Nothing contained herein is a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security. [ER] is not responsible under any circumstances for investment actions taken by the reader. [ER] has never been, and is not currently, a registered or licensed financial advisor or broker/dealer, investment advisor, stockbroker, trader, money manager, compliance or legal officer, and does not perform market making activities. [ER] is not directly employed by any company, group, organization, party or person. The shares of Element 29 Resources are highly speculative, not suitable for all investors. Readers understand and agree that investments in small cap stocks can result in a 100% loss of invested funds. It is assumed and agreed upon by readers that they will consult with their own licensed or registered financial advisors before making any investment decisions.
At the time this article was posted, Element 29 Resources was an advertiser on [ER].
Readers understand and agree that they must conduct their own due diligence above and beyond reading this article. While the author believes he’s diligent in screening out companies that, for any reasons whatsoever, are unattractive investment opportunities, he cannot guarantee that his efforts will (or have been) successful. [ER] is not responsible for any perceived, or actual, errors including, but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts & financial calculations, or for the completeness of this article or future content. [ER] is not expected or required to subsequently follow or cover events & news, or write about any particular company or topic. [ER] is not an expert in any company, industry sector or investment topic.
