VanGold Mining delivers robust PEA & NEW 27.6M silver equiv. ounce (Ind. + Inf.) resource

Note: The Company is raising C$17M in equity at C$0.30, with a half warrant at C$0.45, and is on track to finalize a C$9.5M gold/silver loan facility. All figures are US$ unless indicated otherwise. (Au) = gold, (Ag) = silver. (Eq) = Equivalent

If gold (+24.4% in 2020) were to repeat that performance in 2021, it would end the year at $2,358/oz. If silver (+47.4% in 2020) were to do as well again, it would hit $40/oz.

In looking through recent analyst reports; GS, CIBC, JPM, Citi, Bank of America & Wells Fargo — analysts are forecasting silver to reach $30-$36/oz. and gold $2,000-$2,300/oz. this year or next.

Unlike some silver & gold juniors, VanGold Mining (TSX-V: VGLD) / (OTCQB: VGLDF) doesn’t need $30+ silver or $2,000+ gold to thrive. CEO James Anderson believes his expert team can rehabilitate & restart the past-producing El Pinguico mine in central Mexico within 6-9 months. VanGold has a pro forma Enterprise Value (“EV”) {market cap – cash + debt} of $33.9M = C$43M.

VanGold delivers impressive PEA with ample room to grow

VanGold’s El Pinguico project, is an historic high-grade silver & gold mine in production from the late 1880s until 1913. It’s located in the region of Guanajuato, in central Mexico – an area with 500 years (and counting) of rich mining history.

Readers may recall that in December, management announced a bold proposal to acquire the nearby El Cubo mine & mill complex (“El Cubo”) owned by Endeavour Silver. Closing on this C$19M deal, expected in March, would be a game-changer. 

Recent work by VanGold and third-party consultants has established a 27.6M ounce (Indicated [26%] + Inferred [74%]) silver equiv. (“Ag Eq.”) resource. The 20.4M Inferred ounces carry a high grade of 435 g/t Ag Eq. = ~6.5 g/t Au Eq.

Combined, El Pinguico & El Cubo could deliver up to 1,500 tonnes per day (“tpd”) of silver & gold ore to the mill. However, Mr. Anderson’s team plans to send just half that amount in the initial years while it develops a robust, optimized mine plan that avoids mining dilution.

In a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) completed this month by Behre Dolbear & Co., a 7-yr. mine life would exploit a bit more than 50% of a newly defined [7.2M Indicated + 20.4M Inferred = 27.6M] Ag Eq. ounce resource.

Readers should note that despite a promising third-party PEA, there’s still considerable risk and a number of challenges to overcome (not to mention COVID-19). However, I believe it’s a question of when, not if, the Company crosses over to sustainable profitability.

Restarting mining, milling & waste storage operations at two mine sites, concurrently, represents a significant challenge. However, Anderson, the board and VanGold’s on-the-ground team (incl. 3 world-class technical advisors), have advanced the Company quite nicely.

Risks mitigated by strong balance sheet, near-term production

If investor appetite is any indication, shareholders seem comfortable with VanGold’s risk profile. The team is not only finding silver & gold, they’ve found eager investors to fund expansion, enabling the share price to rise from a low of $0.03 last year, to a (way, way oversubscribed) private placement price at $0.30. The private placement has now been upsized three times to C$17M.

Behre had already been conducting engineering work for VanGold in connection with the proposed acquisition, refurbishment & operation of El Cubo, and restart of El Pinguico. The Group is billed as one of the oldest and most trusted mineral industry advisory firms in the world, specializing in technical and & strategic studies for mining companies.

The PEA uses an Ag price of $19.5/oz., and an Au price of $1,527/oz. — generating an after-tax NPV(6.5%) of ~$30.7M = C$39M. However, at metal prices +25% above the base case ($24.36 / $1,909), the NPV(6.5%) is ~$102M = C$130M.

As I write this, spot Ag is at $27.30/oz. and spot Au = $1,785/oz. Compare that C$130M figure to VanGold’s pro forma EV of ~C$43M {pro forma cash = C$17.5M, pro forma debt = C$9.5M}

If in a few years VanGold has identified five years’ of Measured & Indicated resources that support operating above 750 tpd (mill capacity = 1,500 tpd), then an increase in throughput would be contemplated. Under Endeavour Silver, the Mill routinely ran at > 1,000 tpd and the Mill is reportedly in great shape.

Anderson’s team believes there might be opportunities to acquire outright, or toll-mill, stranded deposits in the region. If true, the mill could be running at 1,000-1,250 tpd by the end of next year, but only if it makes sense to do so. There’s zero interest in growing the operation for growth’s sake.

Given the recent excitement around El Cubo, one might wonder why Endeavour didn’t keep the El Cubo complex and try to make it work. It did try, from 2012-2019, but US$ silver prices were in the mid-teens/oz. for most of that time. El Cubo was deemed too small to move the needle for a company that now has an EV of C$1.2 billion. (~28x larger than VanGold’s).

Blue-sky potential from exploration & higher operating rates

There’s substantial blue-sky potential for the combined El Cubo & El Pinguico project on at least two fronts. First, the PEA contemplates a 7-yr. mine life, yet (in my opinion) under the right circumstances, there’s already enough Indicated + Inferred Ag Eq. ounces to support > 7 years at 750 tpd, or > 1,000 tpd for 7 years.

The trick to (profitably) increase throughput is to only process ore that has minimal waste rock mixed in. [minimize mining dilution]. Second, if management finds higher-grade material at El Pinguico or El Cubo, or at nearby stranded deposits, that can be worked into the mine plan, that would enhance project economics.

A big risk of moving a junior miner forward is access to capital. Here, VanGold is in pretty good shape. Upon closing a raise for gross proceeds of C$17M, drawing down a silver/gold loan for ~C$9.5M (in 60-90 days), and satisfying the immediate C$6.4M cash portion of the C$19M acquisition price next month, there should be ~C$17.5M in available working capital.

C$17.5M would go a long way towards funding the total amount of upfront cap-ex needed (~C$21M) to proceed with the mine plan in the PEA, using mining contractors. The contractor alternative is estimated to be 42% cheaper in terms of upfront cap-ex than pursuing an owner-operated scenario.

The Mother Vein could be a company-maker….

The Veta Madre (Mother Vein) is a regional fault structure that hosts a world famous silver & gold-bearing epithermal system. This structure likely crosses VanGold’s property at depth. Over several centuries, well over a billion ounces of silver have been taken from the Veta Madre, and perhaps 6-7 million ounces of gold.

Where the Mother Vein (hopefully) comes into contact with the Company’s other vein structure, is an area that could host a sizable, high-grade deposit. 

Just a few months ago the Mother Vein narrative represented most of the upside potential in the VanGold story. Today there are a number of near-term catalysts that could be big events for the Company.

VanGold’s prospects have been BOTH enlarged & (somewhat) de-risked. De-risked by raising substantial funds, delivering a PEA and establishing a meaningful 27.6M Ag Eq. ounce (Indicated + Inferred) resource.


As a larger company with a valuable mill, VanGold will have the opportunity to potentially consolidate nearby resources — but only if the price is right and the logistics complement the Company’s prevailing mine plan.

For readers looking to increase their exposure to silver & gold (especially silver given current spot prices), choosing a junior like VanGold Mining (TSX-V: VGLD) / (OTCQB: VGLDF), with a strong mgmt. team and board, in a very good jurisdiction, that could be in commercial production this year, seems like a reasonable speculation to consider.

Disclosures / disclaimers: The content of this article is for information only. Readers fully understand and agree that nothing contained herein, written by Peter Epstein of Epstein Research [ER], (together, [ER]) about VanGold Mining, including but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts, calculations, etc. is to be considered implicit or explicit investment advice. Nothing contained herein is a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security. [ER] is not responsible for investment actions taken by the reader. [ER] has never been, and is not currently, a registered or licensed financial advisor or broker/dealer, investment advisor, stockbroker, trader, money manager, compliance or legal officer, and does not perform market making activities. [ER] is not directly employed by any company, group, organization, party or person. The shares of VanGold Mining are highly speculative, not suitable for all investors. Readers understand and agree that investments in small cap stocks can result in a 100% loss of invested funds. It is assumed and agreed upon by readers that they will consult with their own licensed or registered financial advisors before making any investment decisions.

At the time this article was posted, Peter Epstein owned stock & warrants in VanGold Mining, and the Company was an advertiser on [ER]

While the author believes he’s diligent in screening out companies that, for any reasons whatsoever, are unattractive investment opportunities, he cannot guarantee that his efforts will be (or have been) successful. [ER] is not responsible for any perceived, or actual, errors including, but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts & financial calculations, or for the completeness of this article or future content. [ER] is not expected or required to subsequently follow or cover any specific events or news, or write about any particular company or topic. [ER] is not an expert in any company, industry sector or investment topic.